I am so confused! I got sent this link = http://searchengineland.com/matt-cutts-stick-a-fork-in-it-guest-blogging-is-done-182147 = and now I’m just like “Huh?” Because obviously I have no idea what I’m doing.

I turned off Trackbacks and Pingbacks because of all the spam I was getting, but I guess I should be using the “nofollow” code on links? I thought my site did that automagically! I thought that’s what the no trackbacks/pingbacks was 🙁

I like the idea of giving people props where it’s due, but it was getting a bit ridiculous when I was finding my comment inbox filled with “Interesting site. Many great things to talk about. You haf affected my life in many great and wonderful ways. I have a good article …” and blah blah, bunch of spam. One look at the comment title and the site link “Buy awesome bags (dot) totally spam (dot) com” (but as a real, horrifying URL) and I can tell that people are trying to spam me. I never click the links I’m sent, and definitely not from some stranger off the Internet.

The worst thing? I don’t even use the WordPress comment system on my blog! I have Disqus installed, yet still those spammer people manage to cram their garbage into the built-in comment box and I have no idea how it happens. So I go through once and a while and delete everything, because any real comment would be in my Disqus, and not through some wily backdoor knocking system.

I thought I was the Master of My Own Life!
Beatrice the Biologist: Who's In Charge?

http://www.beatricebiologist.com.

But I guess when it comes down to it, we’re all just tools in the great machine. And there’s always someone trying to use us for their own purposes. Sad, but true.

So if you get an email from some random person on the Internet offering to write posts for your blog or site at no cost to you “… as long as I can include several links …” it might be a good idea to give them a side-eye and a “No candy” if they’re not someone you know. At the very least, you should be able to type their site into your browser yourself (don’t click their links!) and take a look around. If you’re running PeerBlock, WOT, and you’ve got an up-to-date antivirus you should be okay (there’s always a risk on the Internet).

And if you do offer guest blogging, they should be added as a “Contributor” and you can totally “Editor” their asses. What does that mean? Well, you have the power of veto over what they post before it goes live, and you can edit their links to remove any breadcrumbs or garbage they’ve added on the end.

Just because someone is guesting on your blog, that doesn’t give them the power in the relationship. It’s your blog. They have to play by your rules, including not linking to a bunch of awfulness and ruining what you’ve built up.

Be the master of your own life. Tell the wo phage to “Suck it. It’s my way or no way!”


Links of relevance:

Matt Cutts: “The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO” – http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/guest-blogging/. The post in question. He had to clarify some points after hundreds of comments, but basically boils down to: “Watch out who you let guest blog on your site, because the links they want to add in their post can make you look like a spammer.”

*

Wikipedia: “Nofollow” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow. “nofollow is a value that can be assigned to the rel attribute of an HTML a element to instruct some search engines that a hyperlink should not influence the link target’s ranking in the search engine’s index.”

Basically, you add a “nofollow” to a link to keep whatever you’re linking to from gaining influence because of you. So if you link to some horrible site on the Internet featuring puppy torture, you can vent your outrage and call public attention to the atrocities committed, without giving them your tacit approval. You know, so puppy torture people don’t end up as the top result on Google for some kid looking for “cute puppies.”

nofollow jpg

You don’t need to add it to all your links, just the ones you don’t want to give a page rank boost. The sites still receive their hits, you still remain awesome, and spammy sites don’t end up at the top of search results. Otherwise, it’s not a big deal to leave links normal, but be aware that if you’ve got a lot of guest bloggers, you’re responsible for the actions they take on your blog.

*

Wikipedia: “Trackback” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackback. “A trackback is one of four types of linkback methods for website authors to request notification when somebody links to one of their documents. This enables authors to keep track of who is linking to their articles.”

Basically, you write something about someone else’s blog, and when you post it, their blog receives a message saying “Hey, this dude wrote about you.” Then they can approve the trackback and have it show up in their comments “[… so and so talked about blah blah …]” and you get that warm glowy feeling of knowing that your site is mentioned on the site you talked about.

You have to have your trackbacks enabled and so does the site you write about to have this system work. Unfortuantely, spammers have figured out that if they mention your blog on their spam site — usually surrounded with a bunch of info and other links scraped off the Internet — then when they post their garbage, your site receives a trackback saying you were mentioned. And if you don’t know what you’re doing or you accidentally click Approve, all of a sudden there’s a link to their awful site on your blog, giving them a nice hit, and making you look bad as you send your guests to visit the dangerous depths of the Internet or some random porn ring. Unless you hit “Approve,” they shouldn’t appear, though they will clog up your comments page like nobody’s business.

I’ve shut off trackbacks because scrapers and spammers were hitting me so hard I just couldn’t take it anymore. They’re why we can’t have nice things …

*

Wikipedia: “Pingback” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pingback. “A pingback is one of four types of linkback methods for Web authors to request notification when somebody links to one of their documents. This enables authors to keep track of who is linking to, or referring to their articles.”

You want to know who’s mentioning your blog online? Well, a pingback is when one site writes about your site and sends out a signal saying “Hey, I wrote about you.” Your site sends back a ping to check if there’s a link in place, then gives you the message “Site name says: Hey, I wrote about you.” And now you know. You’re famous!

Heroes & Villains at Amazon

When I was a teenager, the movie Hackers was the greatest thing ever to me and I loved it. I still have a copy on DVD.

Sexy Burn, vibrantly dressed Crash, and a bunch of brightly cheerful pseudo-hippies/anarchists. What wasn’t there to love? This movie had it all, including a red leather motorcycle suit, close ups of dewy stomach skin and near kissing-close conversation. Plus a crazy alternate state version of the Internet and reality.

Though considering the direction graphic interfaces are taking, the rise of vblogging, and the changing state of technology, maybe Hackers is closer to reality than it was back when it was made. Sure, it’s full on cheese, but there are some aspects that spark a strange echo in my chest.

xkcd: Hack

http://xkcd.com/1337/

So when I saw “xkcd: The Hack,” my heart did a little skip-beat and I was filled with such happiness that I just had to share it with the world.


Links of interest:

IMDB: “Hackers (1995)” – Hackers. Starring: Johnny Lee Miller, Angelina Jolie. I had such a crush on Johnny Lee Miller at the time, and Angelina Jolie was completely mesmerizing. I wanted to see more of Joey, which meant I stalked Jesse Bradford for a time. Plus Matthew Lillard will always be my favorite Cereal Killer.

*

Wikipedia: “Hackers (film)” – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackers_%28film%29. Spoiler alert?

Faizel 02 at Amazon

Wow. I found this = “What is Fan Fiction – and why is it making people nervous?” = and I am just stunned by this man’s complete IGNORANCE, nay, stupidity. He doesn’t even know that it’s “fanfiction” or “fanfic,” not “FanFic.”

He thinks the gender-divide is equal, when fanfiction is really about 76%+ female powered. Most writers are in their 20s-50s+. The most popular fandoms are Harry Potter, Sherlock, Marvel, Supernatural, and I want to say maybe The Avengers (Stony!), though I’d have to do some research, and that’s largely me hoping 😛 (I also want to believe that Buffy is still a booming fandom because that’s my slashy baby, but Xander will never quite be the Little Black Dress that Harry Potter or Methos have become.)

Mostly I’m curious as to why all these men that don’t know anything about fanfiction are being asked to write these asinine articles about it :/ It shows a terrible lack of commonsense on the part of the site admins. I mean, if you’re going to ask someone to write you an article, why wouldn’t you go to someone that actually knows what they’re talking about?

All you have to do is look at the comments to see that there are masses of people much more intelligent than the OP available for questioning.

Though I will tell you flat out that if you are with some media outlet – Do Not Approach A Fanficcer. (I’m looking at you Buzzfeed. You totally freaked out my friend by just randomly coming up to her and asking her for an interview. If she ends up friends-locking her LiveJournal because you can’t respect the rules, I’m going to be upset because she’s awesome and there’s so many people that would miss out if she instigated a full-cloak.)

Do your research like a regular person does: by googling “fanfiction,” maybe hitting up some websites like Fanfiction.net, Archive of Our Own, Fanlore, and just treating it like you would when you’re entering a new society or a hip cool forum that you want to join. Basically, keep your mouth shut, your eyes open, follow the rules of the community, and don’t be such a n00b.

This guy could have done the most basic of research by just searching Wikipedia. The fact that he didn’t, and chose instead to make up his own facts and figures and even his own lexicon of “FanFic” phraseology, is proof that he has a complete lack of respect for all of the people of the world, from those that love fanfiction or hate fanfiction to those that don’t have a single clue what fanfiction is but are curious about this thing that their child loves.

For the sake of the children, don’t be so ignorant in the future Stephen Downes. It makes you look foolish, disrespectful, and most of all, a lazy writer.

* * *

The “Unwritten” Rules of Fanfiction:

1st Rule: You do not talk about fanfiction.
2nd Rule: You DO NOT talk about fanfiction.

When I was a teenager and first discovered fanfic, it was like Fight Club. It was spoken of in whispers and Yahoo groups, Fanfiction.net was “The Pit of Voles,” and the efiction code was spawning archives far and wide.

Nowadays, there are so many people in fandom that the rules have gone slack. Some writers *cough*EL James*cough* have broken the vows of silence and done the unthinkable — profited off this thing we created out of love. There are so many newheads running around that seem to think they are the first people to have ever discovered fanfiction, and they don’t know the rules that fanficcers have followed for generations or they decide that the rules don’t apply to them. (“Espechul snowflake” syndrome.)

Basically, the biggest rule of fanfiction is to write it because you love the characters and the story. Write because you have a story in your heart that you want to share. And never profit from it, because that crosses the line of fair use and other writers can become targets, and fanfiction can be rousted out by the PTBs.

EL James earned herself some backlash not just by those in Twilight fandom, but in every fandom, because things could have gone wrong. She could have rocked the boat so hard that fanfiction could have been ruined for everyone. Because when it comes down to it, the copyright holder has the power in the fanfiction relationship, and even though there are lawyers able to fight the fight, they shouldn’t have to.

Because “fair use” can become a very narrow line when money is involved. And profiting from fanfiction has always been the biggest no-no out there.


Links of interest:

Sycophant Hex: “Avoiding Mistakes in Fanfiction Writing: A Beginner’s Guide” – http://sycophanthex.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=45&Itemid=41. Interesting little guide. Gets better toward the end.

*

Geekosystem: “Why Writer’s Don’t Read Fanfiction of Their Own Work (It’s Not Because They Think It’s Stupid)” – http://www.geekosystem.com/writers-fanfiction/. This one is something some fans need to take a close look at, then follow up with some other articles. Why? Because you don’t take your fandom jizz to the PTB and expect them to care and/or be comfortable with what you have to say. From a legal standpoint, they don’t want to be accused of stealing your story. Remember that kerfluffle with Marion Zimmer Bradley? Yeah, that was a case of one fan(atic) ruining things for everyone. A lot of authors got turned-off of the idea of running their own anthos and zines.

It also reminds me of that Supernatural Q&A where an overenthusiastic fan asked one of the actors whether Destiel could happen. No! Bad girl, no cookie. You don’t bring your shipping obsession up with the actors. You don’t go up to the wife of one of the Sherlock stars and harass her because her husband is obviously gay for your favorite slash pairing. No. And you especially don’t want to see Fox Mulder (’cause that’s his name IRL, right?) on a national television show being surprise attacked by the host asking “Did you know there’s a whole site about Mulder and Krycek?” and then having the big screen cut to manipulated images of Mulder/Krycek taken from a fansite that immediately had to shut down even though they had some of the most beautiful R and X-rated renderings I have ever seen (those girls in Australia really know how to cut and paste. That stuff should have been hanging in a gallery.)

There are some lines not meant to be crossed. Don’t send your fanfic or fanart to the original creator. Don’t ask the actors or actresses uncomfortable questions because you can’t differentiate between real life and fantasy. Be aware that some people can be really judgy and maybe even abusive about fanfic/fanart, and if you don’t want to be mocked or bullied IRL, use a fandom name and keep it fandom-related. (Especially if you’re a high school or college student, because you know, you might want to have a job someday, or maybe you might have a family member that turns out to be really against your obsession with Hannigram.) The last thing you want is for someone to run a search on your email address and have all your fandom stuff pop up porn style — get a fandom email address, fandom LiveJournal, whatever.

*

Dear Author: “Q&A with Professor Rebecca Tushnet” – http://dearauthor.com/features/essays/qa-with-professor-rebecca-tushnet/.

*

Tushnet.wordpress.com: “Copyright Law, Fan Practices, and the Right of the Author” – http://tushnet.com/writings/. Scroll down the page to find the article. It is in PDF form and is titled fandombook.pdf. It’s number 35 from the top.

*

Organization for Transformative Works: “FAQ” https://transformativeworks.org/faq. Click Legal and answer your own questions. They pretty much cover every concern.

Copyright is intended to protect the creator’s right to profit from her work for a period of time to encourage creative endeavor and the widespread sharing of knowledge. But this does not preclude the right of others to respond to the original work, either with critical commentary, parody, or, we believe, transformative works.

In the United States, copyright is limited by the fair use doctrine. The legal case of Campbell v. Acuff-Rose held that transformative uses receive special consideration in fair use analysis. For those interested in reading in-depth legal analysis, more information can be found on the Fanlore Legal Analysis page.

– Why does the OTW believe that transformative works are legal?

While the OTW believes in transformative works, there is a difference between fair use and for-profit.

*

Center for Media & Social Impact: “Documentary Filmmaker’s Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use” – http://www.cmsimpact.org/fair-use/best-practices/documentary/documentary-filmmakers-statement-best-practices-fair-use. As the OTW say, “Best practices can successfully defend fair use rights even without litigation.”

*

Ebook Friendly: “10 most popular fanfiction websites” – http://ebookfriendly.com/fan-fiction-websites/. Lists archives, and gives suggestions on how to search.

*

Croatoan: “Where has Anne Rice fanfiction gone?” – http://www.angelfire.com/rant/croatoan/. A glimpse at history, and the horrors of an author going after the fans.

*

Fanlore: “Chronology” – http://fanlore.org/wiki/Category:Chronology.

*

Fandom Wank: “Fandom Wank Lives!” – http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank/. These guys are the reason we don’t mess with fandom. Very entertaining/reason to keep it real. What is wank? Wank is: Self-aggrandizing posturing. Fannish absurdities. Circular ego-stroking. Endless flamewars. Pseudointellectual definitions. e.g. Entertainment for the rest of us.

Panoply at Amazon

Source link: http://xkcd.com/1354/

Other links to Heartbleed info:

Heartbleed Bug – the site themselves: http://heartbleed.com/

Lifehacker – “What the Heartbleed Security Bug Means for You”: http://lifehacker.com/what-the-heartbleed-security-bug-means-for-you-1560801201

Mashable – “The Heartbleed Hit List: Passwords you need to change right now”: http://mashable.com/2014/04/09/heartbleed-bug-websites-affected/

CNET – “How to protect yourself from the Heartbleed bug”: http://www.cnet.com/news/how-to-protect-yourself-from-the-heartbleed-bug/

CNET – “Heartbleed bug: Check which sites have been patched”: http://www.cnet.com/how-to/which-sites-have-patched-the-heartbleed-bug/