Are the new terms of service for Ko-Fi legit? Or is it another site I "should quit" but can’t because it’s a viable source of income?

What do people want from my Ko-Fi? => https://ko-fi.com/harperwck <=

Notification and updates of major stuff? Everyday nonsense? Just drawings and photographs?

What is Ko-fi anyway? What am I using it for?

Is it a tip jar? Do I put it out there to "Hey, hey, this is a reminder that I exist"-nudge strangers on the Internet?

Is it "all the money I have in the world"-levels of important to my financial self?

Is my Ko-fi page the equivalent of a bowl pushed out by a street performer? Like, there’s all kinds of stuff being put out there but not being linked to because of tough terms of use, but "Here’s a way to support my writings. Here’s some cat pics or some coloring pages in return"?

I don’t really do anything outside the terms of use, but I’d prefer to err on the side of caution.

I produce content for Mature Audiences. It’s out there and available.

There have been times when I’ve described the viscera rather than glossing away.

So I think it’s good to have a PG tip jar that can be shown to people. Something where people can visibly see it being used, and that builds interest in my content. But someone doesn’t have to dive face-first into pure filth when they’re looking for my nonsensical babblings (like this piece and the stuff about raw milk).


"Worm" is a webnovel that I enjoyed. Though it was really long and "gritty"-feeling.

The Chinese novel I’m listening to is a lot of everyday stuff.

She’s an Ancient Person transmigrated into a modern life. She’s basically "the leftover" part of an isekai story.

The person she replaced REPLACED her.

So while she, a half-orphaned princess whose mother was sent to the Cold Palace before she was born, is saving a family that otherwise would have fallen apart… That modern person was in the past living her best life as an empress and local near-deity, in a life the princess would have died in.

The flipside of all those novels and animes where a modern person wakes up in the body of an ancient person. While they’re rampaging in a past the body would have died in, the modern body that would have died is filled with a different soul that’s better able to live a particular life.

It’s almost like their souls were switched so that they would grow up in their particular worlds and learn the information they needed to survive then switched back.

Usually the super tough "but believes in magic just in case" ancient times male lead seems like the type to force monks to do some perverted magic rituals. No proof that they do anything. But grisly. And maybe effective.

Switching souls had been a more excessive spell than he’d imagined. But having to tell someone one more time: "If you don’t pasteurize your raw milk when you bring it home, don’t think I’m going to have any sympathy for your listeria. There are probably over-the-counter treatments. Meanwhile we’re in the midst of a pandemic they’ve stopped serving public safety announcements about."

The spell had seemed innocuous enough. A little bit of nothing scribbled in an old family journal. And the steps had seemed nearly childishly simple.

When drunk, it had seemed like a fun thing to do with a group of friends. Reciting some words. Burning some herbs. Bleeding a few drops of blood onto an open flame. Thinking real hard about a wish (though it had been more of a notion really).

There’d been plans for a big dinner afterward. Maybe a big order of tacos. But that section of memory had been ripped away, so that there was a vague sense that fun had been had, but it couldn’t be remembered. A broken connection that was never going to be fixed.

It was all waking up in someone else’s body in the past. But there was never going to be a "Quantum Leap"-skip through time to get away. Because someone else had taken control of the magics.

Spell-casting was tied to the body.

And the body was currently in another space and time. The proof being the stranger-face looking back from the bronze mirror.

Uramichi Oniisan 01 at Amazon

I ordered this manual potsticker maker machine–

Manual potsticker making machine

–and it really works.

I made my own wrappers and made chicken potstickers with it. And it went pretty good (until I tried to fry a panful and burnt them, but that wasn’t the fault of the machine).

With homemade wrappers, the dough is sticky enough that you should be able to lay them onto the paddles, fill them, and squeeze the potstickers after pushing down the plunger. When using store bought wrappers, you’re supposed to use a pastry brush and brush the edges with water so they’ll stick.

The first two I made, I don’t know if I was too excited and pushed too fast, but the potstickers dropped out the bottom like they’re supposed to but it was super fast and they bounced off the plate onto the floor. So there’s a bit of a learning curve. But it really is a revelatory machine.

I could have bought an automatic potsticker folder, but I didn’t want to have to worry about plugging it in… and what if I want to make potstickers during a power outage?

Here’s the amazon ADLINK: https://amzn.to/3TnTlAj. <= manual potsticker maker.

I’m thinking about rolling out some pie dough and making apple pie potstickers. I’m not sure how long to bake or fry them, but it seems like a fun experiment.

The machine takes 3-inch diameter discs of dough. So if that seems too small, maybe they have a larger empanada machine?

I just feel like the existence of potsticker making machines is proof that we’re currently living in the future.

The Way of the Househusband 01 at Amazon

I tried to send an email to the site that hosts the machine translated Chinese novels I’ve been enjoying, and I got a notice of failure to deliver because their settings are misconfigured.

I really wonder who is running the site and what’s going on in the background 🤔

I tried to make an account with them before, and it wouldn’t let me. And I’m not part of their Discord server. And I’ve noticed that other people post their complaints in reviews of various books.

So like, I have to side-eye the way they’re handling things on their end. Shady af.

I want to finish reading the novels I’ve chosen, so I’ve taken to switching off Javascript when I’m using their site. No more redirects and nonsense.

So I’m thinking someone jacked into the javascript running their advertisements (which I don’t see because I run blocker).

And now I’m second-guessing the use of javascript for my own projects.

I really like that people can play my games in their browser on itch.io (https://harperkingsley.itch.io). And I like that while some games are public, I can have some that are only accessible by chosen audiences. But for hosting on my own site? Or making my own app?

I focused more on "affordable hosting" then anything else, and I don’t have the money to pay for all the extra bells and whistles. So if someone came in from the side to hijack my javascript… I’m not ready to handle that level of risk.

It’s very stressful.

And I’m only chapter 210 out of 1290 of the current novel.

Small Gods at Amazon

I know she’s a Big Name Author. I’ve read a lot of her books and have fanned her writings when I was heavy into the genre.

As a child, I was in the mall when the bookstore had her as a guest. It didn’t look like a big signing event… but I didn’t go in.

Anyways, I recognize that she’s a legend of the field.

But for the sake of the public good, why are you listening to her opinion on Real Life events? Like, real professional journalists are giving her article space!

The articles should exist. They simply shouldn’t be appearing in Main Line NEWS sources.

Whatever happened to "Letters to the Editor"? Weren’t people able to write back about previous letters?

I think I remember a "feelgood" story about two elderly gentlemen and part of their frenemy relationship is writing a Letter to the Editor and the other responding to it. They basically sent letters back and forth, affirming that even when they don’t see each other they can know they’re both still alive and kicking. Both are widowers.

As a child, my class was asked to write letters to the editor, and my letter was chosen.

It was a big deal to me. But at the same time it wasn’t an article that could be shown off at family events. Because I was an aggressively worded child.

I saw that newspaper and it made me feel good. And I’m glad there wasn’t also publicly available video.

I was an embarrassing child. Endearing at moments, but sometimes so bluntly…

I’m glad I was raised in a time when parents weren’t able to completely share their child’s life on the Internet. And by the time the technology appeared, my parents and grandparents were too old to share stuff without asking for my help to do it. So there’d be a chance to step in and change the focus.

I hate that much sense of loss-of-control. I can’t imagine my entire childhood being recorded and broadcast live to strangers. At the time, I likely would have thought it was great. Or my need to please and impress the adults in my life would have had me soft-selling myself on the idea that "It’s great!" while not realizing I was being taken advantage of.